Skip to main content

Vocabulary & Topics · Lesson 8

Collocation and lexical precision

Replace vague or translated wording with natural, precise combinations while choosing vocabulary that fits meaning, genre and register rather than displaying unnecessary rarity.

≈ 75–90 mincollocation, lexical bundles and precise meaningverb-noun pairssemantic preferenceediting18+ guided responses
NoticeObserve meaning in context.
DiscoverConnect form, meaning, and use.
BuildChoose and assemble accurate language.
DrillRepair errors and retrieve fluently.
CommunicateUse it for a real purpose.
ReflectCheck control and plan the next use.

Today’s central idea: Lexical precision combines exact meaning with conventional partnership. Learn the node word, its sense, its grammatical pattern, its common partners, and the genres where the combination is expected.

Retrieval bridge

Say each answer before revealing it. The goal is to reactivate language that today’s lesson will extend.

Connect to what you already know

Complete three strong combinations: ___ a decision, ___ responsibility, ___ evidence.

Replace do a mistake and strong rain.

Give a neutral and formal alternative to look into a problem.

Notice before the rule

Correct words can still form an unnatural combination

A report has accurate individual words but several weak combinations.

The team did a detailed analysis and made strong progress.

The team conducted a detailed analysis and made substantial progress.

The results raise serious concerns but provide limited evidence of direct harm.

  • Which verbs sound conventional with analysis and progress?
  • Why is substantial more natural than strong before progress?
  • Which nouns regularly follow raise and provide in the final sentence?

Noticing check

What is a collocation?

Discover the system

Lexical precision combines exact meaning with conventional partnership. Learn the node word, its sense, its grammatical pattern, its common partners, and the genres where the combination is expected.

PatternFormExample
verb + nounpose a risk; reach a conclusionThe delay poses a serious risk.
adjective + nouncompelling evidence; tentative conclusionThe study offers compelling evidence.
adverb + adjectivedeeply concerned; broadly consistentThe findings are broadly consistent.
lexical bundlein light of; with respect to; there is little evidence thatIn light of the results, we revised the plan.

Meaning and choice

Speaker’s choiceUse it when…Example
strengththe combination is frequent and expectedheavy rain, not strong rain
semantic preferencea word tends to occur with particular outcomes or attitudespose often introduces risk, threat or question
genrea bundle organizes a report, discussion or informal exchangewith respect to is common in formal explanation
precisionthe verb names the exact relationshipcause, contribute to, trigger and coincide with make different claims

Sound natural: Store collocations as stress groups: REACH a conCLU-sion, POSE a RISK, COM-pelling E-vidence. Fluency improves when the whole chunk is retrieved together.

High-value repairs

AvoidUseWhy
We did a decision.We made/reached a decision.Decision conventionally combines with make or reach in this meaning.
The report proves a possible link.The report suggests/identifies a possible link.Prove conflicts with possible and overstates the evidence.
Use rare words to sound advanced.Use the most precise natural combination for the audience and genre.Unnecessary rarity reduces clarity and often creates collocational errors.

High-value C1 combinations

Learn each as meaning plus pattern, not as an isolated synonym list.

Evidence

provide evidencesupport a claimdraw a conclusionraise doubtsremain inconclusive

Change

implement a policyintroduce a measureundergo changedrive growthpose a challenge

Argument

acknowledge a limitationaddress a concernchallenge an assumptionmake a distinctionqualify a claim

Read language doing real work

Editing an evidence summary

Compare vague drafting with precise revision.

Draft: The survey did a lot of information and showed a big problem with access.

Revision: The survey generated detailed evidence and identified a substantial barrier to access.

Final caution: The findings raise serious concerns, but the sample is too limited to support a firm conclusion about the entire population.

Build controlled accuracy

Reusable practice routes

Choose today’s practice set

Choose the set that fits today’s learner. Each set contains different examples.

Core: Secure the central form-and-meaning decisions before increasing the pressure.

The committee formally reached its final choice. Which chunk fits?

The new rule may create danger for small firms. It may ___ a risk.

The evidence is persuasive and difficult to dismiss. Which phrase fits?

The study cannot prove cause but shows partial influence. Which verb fits?

Core set selected.

Build the cautious evidence claim

Combine the strength and the limitation.

Diagnose and repair

Find the precise problem. A useful correction includes the reason, not only the repaired sentence.

Repair the light verb

The committee did a difficult decision.

Repair evidence strength

The small survey proved a possible connection.

Repair the adjective-noun pair

The report presents powerful uncertainty.

Repair vague advanced wording

The measure effectuated a good change in outcomes.

Fluency drill

Respond aloud first. Reveal the model only after you have committed to an answer; your wording can differ if the meaning and form are right.

Transform and expand

Replace do, get and make in a vague project update.

Create a collocation chain around evidence.

Contrast cause, contribute to, trigger and coincide with.

Self-correct an unnatural phrase aloud.

Play and practice

Games and a short reading that recycle this lesson. Use them as a warm-up, a fast finisher, or homework. Each one checks itself.

Read

Should the pool open earlier?

Read once for meaning. Then read again and do the tasks below.

Survey summary247 wordsAbout 2 min

This spring, the Eastside Community Center asked its members whether the swimming pool should open at 6 a.m. on weekdays. Of the 412 people who responded, 61 percent said they would use an early session at least once a week. Most of the remaining members said the current 8 a.m. start already suits them. The results provide useful evidence of demand, especially among shift workers and parents of young children.

The survey has clear weaknesses, and this summary acknowledges each limitation openly. Only current members could respond, so people who might join for an early session were not included. Several respondents raised doubts about whether the parking lot would be safely lit at that hour.

An earlier opening would also pose a challenge for staffing. The center currently employs two morning lifeguards, and neither is available before seven. Hiring a third would increase costs by about $18,000 a year. Training a new lifeguard takes about six weeks, so any trial could not start before September.

Taken together, the figures support the claim that demand exists, but it is too early to draw a firm conclusion about long-term use. We therefore recommend a three-month trial. Before the center can implement the new policy, the board will need to address the concerns about lighting and staffing. If attendance falls below forty swimmers a week, the pool will return to its current hours. Staff will count swimmers at every early session, and the center will publish attendance figures each month.

Find it

Tap the verb in each of the 8 verb + noun collocations from the lesson’s reference box (Evidence, Change, Argument), in any form. Example: make in make a distinction.

Check your understanding

1. Why might the survey underestimate demand?

2. What staffing challenge would an earlier opening pose?

3. Why is it too early to draw a firm conclusion?

Sort it

Natural or not?

Tap a word, then tap the box it belongs in. Press Check when the tray is empty.

Word search

Find the strong partner

Find the word for each clue. Words run in any direction, even backwards. Tap the first letter, then the last.

  • ___ a conclusion (a partner other than reach) → ?
  • ___ evidence: persuasive and hard to dismiss (from the verb compel) → ?
  • ___ a concern: deal with it → ?
  • ___ a policy: put it into action → ?
  • ___ consistent: in general, not in every detail (from broad) → ?
  • ___ doubts: bring them up (also: ___ your hand) → ?
  • ___ evidence: supply it → ?

Crossword

Precise partners

Click a clue or a square, then type. Press Check when you finish.

Across

Down

Choose the right amount of challenge

Communicate in three steps

The precision editor. Pick one starting point, then move up only if the learner is ready. True or invented details are equally acceptable.

1

Personal answer

Make the language yours

Use the lesson’s earlier example or invent a similar situation. The details do not need to be personal.

Edit a fictional report containing vague verbs and translated combinations, then defend every revision. Start with this cue: What exact relationship does the verb claim?

Next cues
  • Which partners does this noun prefer?
  • Does the combination fit the genre?
2

Guided role play

The precision editor

Edit a fictional report containing vague verbs and translated combinations, then defend every revision.

Role 1Writer: present the intended meaning, genre and strength of evidence.

Role 2Editor: replace only language that is vague, unnatural or misleading and explain the collocational choice.

Useful language
  • What exact relationship does the verb claim?
  • Which partners does this noun prefer?
  • Does the combination fit the genre?
  • Is a common word more precise here?
3

Real-world challenge

Remove the support

Draft 170 to 210 words about fictional survey findings, then revise at least eight lexical combinations.

C1 target: Sustain a clear position for two minutes, adapt to a challenge, and reformulate one point more precisely.

Include
  • Use four verb-noun and three adjective-noun collocations.
  • Include one lexical bundle that organizes the argument.
  • Avoid claiming direct causation unless the evidence supports it.

Write for a real reader

Write and edit an evidence paragraph

Draft 170 to 210 words about fictional survey findings, then revise at least eight lexical combinations.

Your text must

  • Use four verb-noun and three adjective-noun collocations.
  • Include one lexical bundle that organizes the argument.
  • Avoid claiming direct causation unless the evidence supports it.

Reveal a possible model only after you have drafted your own version.

Reflect and transfer

Can you do this without the page?

  • Choose natural partners for high-value nouns, verbs and adjectives.
  • Distinguish exact causal and evidential relationships.
  • Prefer precise common wording over vague or inflated vocabulary.

Your next use: Collect five useful combinations from a real professional text and record each with its meaning, pattern and one original sentence. Return to the retrieval bridge next lesson.